Cases 41 - 50 of 157
United States of America v. Gonzales' Personal Property et al
as 4:2017cv00063
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Gonzales' Personal Property, A HIPOINT PISTOL, A JIMENEZ ARMS PISTOL and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0924
USA v. Derry, NH, 10 Emerald Dr et al
as 1:2017cv00056
Defendant:
$46,400.00 US Currency, $740.00 US Currency, Assorted Coins and others
Claimant:
Anthony Barth, Russell J. Barth and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States v. LNG Express, Inc.
as 16-3646
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
$579,475.00 in U.S. Currency
Claimant - Appellant:
LNG Express, Inc.
United States of America vs. $67,906.43 in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2016cv00362
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$67,906.43 in U.S. Currency, 86 one troy oz gold Canada Maple Leaf coins, 15 one troy oz gold Credit Suisse bars and others
Claimant:
Michael Cozzi
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. ONE RUGER 10/22 .22 CALIBER RIFLE et al (JRG2)
as 2:2016cv00157
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
ONE RUGER 10/22 .22 CALIBER RIFLE, 2928 ROUNDS ASSORTED AMMUNITION and ONE GLOCK INC. 42 PISTOL .380 CALIBER
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
USA v. $525,695.24, et al
as 16-3542
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
$525,695.24, Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Investment Acct #74068415, in the name of Osamah H. Salouha, $189,489.08, Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Acct #936048107 in the name of other Samah H. Salouha, $1,000.33, Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Acct #2952537609 in the name of other Osama H. Salouha and others
Defendant:
$182,078.99, Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Acct#973832124 in the name of Sbeih Sbeih
USA v. $525,695.24, et al
as 16-3542
Defendant:
$4,999.99, Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Acct #2952537609 in the name of other Osama H. Salouha, $50,086.84, Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Acct #2952537609 in the name of other Osama H. Salouha, $1,000.33, Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Acct #2952537609 in the name of other Osama H. Salouha and others
Defendant / Appellant:
HYS HEALTH MART, INC. and OSAMA H. SALOUHA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Kaplan et al
as 2:2016cv02601
Defendant:
Any and all funds on deposit in Bank of America Account Number 898065992721 held in the names of Roger Kaplan and Karen Kaplan, Any and all funds on deposit in People's United Bank Account Number 1300011283 held in the names of Roger Kaplan and Karen Kaplan, Any and all funds on deposit in People's United Bank Account Number 9000027491 held in the names of Roger Kaplan and Karen Kaplan and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA, et al v. Noblecare Pharmacy, et al
as 16-1308
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
NOBLECARE PHARMACY, RIO DETROIT, INC., dba Wayne Pharmacy, GDP2, INC., dba Exceptional Pharmacy and others
Appellant:
BUBUBHAI PATEL
United States of America v. Approximately $7,041.73 seized from Bank of America Checking Account #375008753246 held in the name of Abyssinia Love Knot Physical Therapy, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv10314
Defendant:
Approximately $7,041.73 seized from Bank of America Checking Account #375008753246 held in the name of Abyssinia Love Knot Physical Therapy, LLC, Approximately $10,732.49 seized from Bank of America Checking Account #006681356967 held in the name of Atul Shah or Yogina A Shah, Approximately $200,367.65 seized from Comerica Bank Business Savings Account #9414025842 held in the name of 1st Priority Physical Therapy, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America and Steven T Brantley
Claimant:
Dr. Kartik H Shah, allen gregory, Atul C Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
