Drug Related Seizure of Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
United States of America v. The Sum of $2,851.00 in United States Currency
as 5:2023cv00417
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: The Sum of $2,851.00 in United States Currency
Interested Party: Tyrone Douglas Amar, II
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 841 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00235
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CURRENCY and REAL ESTATE
Claimant: DOUGLAS W MCDONALD and JAMES J MACIE
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Approximately $22,980 in United States Currency We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00572
Defendant: Approximately $22,980 in United States currency seized from Jeffrey Moss on June 5, 2020 at the Charlotte-Douglas International Airport and Approximately $22,980 in United States Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
United States of America v. 6586/6588/6900 Upper Cow Creek Road, Douglas County, Azalea, Oregon et al
as 2:2019cv00253
Defendant: 6586/6588/6900 Upper Cow Creek Road, Douglas County, Azalea Oregon, Specified Property Located Within Debusk Estates Subdivision, Greene County, Greeneville Tennessee and 12959 Water Gap Road, Josephine County, Williams Oregon
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983
United States of America v. The Premises and Real Property with Buildings, Appurtenances and Improvements at 9070 Michael Douglas Drive, Clarence, New York
as 1:2019cv00193
Defendant: 9070 Michael Douglas Drive, Clarence Center, New York and The Premises and Real Property with Buildings, Appurtenances and Improvements at 9070 Michael Douglas Drive, Clarence, New York
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: Lauren Seitz, Five Star Bank and Anthony Gerace
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Real Property Located Temecula, California We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2016cv02129
Defendant: Real Property Located in Douglas City, California, Real Property Located in Fountain Valley, California and Real Property Located in Temecula, California
Plaintiff: United States of America
In Re Release of Seized Property
as 3:2015cv02818
Movant: Craig Douglas Watson , Melissa Joanne Harvey and Frosty Farms Cooperative, Inc.
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0983
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 5246 South Forest Road, South Range, Douglas County, Wisconsin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00300
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 5246 South Forest Road, South Range, Douglas County, Wisconsin, With All Appurtenances, Improvements, and Attachments Thereon and 5905 South County Road K, South Range, Douglas County, Wisconsin, With All Appurtenances, Improvements, and Attachments Thereon
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881
United States of America v. 2979 Peyton Woods Court, Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2013cv00864
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 2979 Peyton Woods Court, Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia, 2806 Chaucer Drive, Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia, 160 Arcadia Circle, Atlanta, Fulton County, Georgia and others
United States v. Shannon William We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1200
Plaintiff - Appellee: United States of America
Defendant: $1,000.00 refunded to Mango Creek Properties, Inc. from GBS Partners,Inc. seized on January 28, 2010, $1,000.00 seized on December 22, 2009 from Spence Escrow Company from an escrow account holding money for Deshawn Hernandez, $85,120.00 in United States currency seized from safe deposit box number 29 at Pinnacle Bank on December 18, 2009 and others
Claimant - Appellant: Shannon E. Williams

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?