Labor/Management Reporting & Disclosure Act Cases filed in Texas matching "S"
Cases 101 - 110 of 829,137
FATA
as 5:2024cv02402
Not Yet Classified: ABRAHIM FATA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardona, Jr. v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Volusia County)
as 6:2024cv01031
Petitioner: Marcos Cardona, Jr.
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhonda Burnett, et al v. The National Association of Realtors, et al
as 24-2143
Plaintiff: Rhonda Burnett, Jerod Breit, Jeremy Keel and others
Defendant: National Association of Realtors, HomeServices of America, Keller Williams Realty, Inc. and others
Appellant: James Mullis
In re: Clantech, Inc.
as 24-1897
Appellant: In re: CLANTECH, INC. and MODERN FONT APPLICATIONS LLC
Defendant / Appellee: KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Corrales v. Robinson
as 24-40398
Petitioner: Jose Luis Corrales
Respondent: S. Robinson, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute Beaumont Low
Clarence Davis v. Capital One N.A.
as 24-1507
Plaintiff: CLARENCE DAVIS
Defendant: CAPITAL ONE N.A.
Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc. v. EPA, et al
as 24-1170
Petitioner: Cleveland-Cliffs, Inc.
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
United States Steel Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 24-1171
Petitioner: United States Steel Corporation
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Brian Dillow v. Treasurer of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 24-2004
Plaintiff: BRIAN DILLOW
Defendant: TREASURER OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Davon Tate v. Christopher Smith
as 24-6535
Petitioner: DAVON TATE
Respondent: WARDEN CHRISTOPHER S. SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?