Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Jones v. Independent Television Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv05361
Plaintiff:
Danielle L. Jones
Defendant:
INDEPENDENT TELEVISION SERVICE, INC., SARAH MCNAMARA and JAMEDRA BROWN FLEISCHMAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Enders v. Robert J. Young Company LLC
as 3:2021cv00411
Defendant:
Robert J. Young Company LLC doing business as RJ Young
Plaintiff:
Sarah Enders
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Lebovic v. Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10205
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lebovic
Defendant:
Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston, Inc., Sarah Abramson, Rachael Weisz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tollefson v. Benton County Human Services
as 0:2021cv00260
Plaintiff:
Sarah Tollefson
Defendant:
Benton County Human Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CHARLES v. AMERICAN GUARD SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2021cv20332
Defendant:
AMERICAN GUARD SERVICES, INC
Plaintiff:
SARAH CHARLES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
CHARLES v. AMERICAN GUARD SERVICES, INC
as 1:2021cv20323
Defendant:
AMERICAN GUARD SERVICES, INC
Plaintiff:
SARAH CHARLES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Hutcheson v. New York Medical College et al
as 7:2021cv00639
Defendant:
New York Medical College, ABC CORPS. 1-10 (said names being fictitious and unknown), JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10 (said names being fictitious and unknown) and others
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hutcheson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Balderas v. Alorica Inc.
as 1:2021cv00048
Plaintiff:
Sarah Balderas
Defendant:
Alorica Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
RICCI v. JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
as 0:2020cv61339
Defendant:
JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.
Plaintiff:
SARAH RICCI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Johnston v. Konecranes, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01378
Defendant:
Konecranes, Inc., Emily Mowery, Jennifer Dine and others
Plaintiff:
Sarah Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
