Cases 21 - 30 of 103
Matthew Calio v. Camden County Board of Chosen Freeholders
as 22-2261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW CALIO
Defendant / Appellee:
CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, doing business as CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Johnson v. Lenco Industries, Inc.
as 1:2022cv10986
Plaintiff:
Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
Lenco Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Lenco Industries, Inc.
as 3:2022cv10986
Plaintiff:
Matthew Johnson
Defendant:
Lenco Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Warren v. Golling Roseville, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv11059
Plaintiff:
Melissa Warren
Defendant:
Golling Roseville, Inc., Matthew Godfrey and Mark De Mara
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Willis v. DCMM Rental One, Ltd.
as 4:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Matthew Willis
Defendant:
DCMM Rental One, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Franco v. Smartsheet Inc.
as 1:2021cv00917
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW FRANCO
Defendant:
SMARTSHEET INC., A domestic corporation and Smartsheet Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Stoner v. Cumberland County et al
as 1:2021cv01753
Plaintiff:
Matthew S. Stoner
Defendant:
Cumberland County and Coroner Charles E. Hall
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Matthews v. Metal Shark L L C
as 6:2021cv02620
Plaintiff:
Marvin Matthews
Defendant:
Gravois Aluminum Boats L L C and Metal Shark L L C doing business as Gravois Aluminum Boats L L C
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Morris vs Paycom Payroll, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv22396
Defendant:
BRENDAN P. NUESSLE, AMY MINOTTI and PAYCOM PAYROLL, LLC
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611
Sawicki v. Bangor Township Schools
as 1:2021cv11497
Defendant:
Bangor Township Schools
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sawicki
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
