Cases 41 - 50 of 13,660
Palomera Arreaola v. Labor Personnel, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02287
Plaintiff:
Edith Erendida Palomera Arreaola
Defendant:
Labor Personnel, LLC and FIC America Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Aubrey v. Radial, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jerad Aubrey
Defendant:
Radial, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McCoy v. Darlington, City of
as 4:2024cv02942
Plaintiff:
Hailey McCoy
Defendant:
Darlington, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
NASH, JR. v. SOHO STUDIO, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv06016
Plaintiff:
LARRY NASH, JR.
Defendant:
SOHO STUDIO, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-5 and 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Jones v. Atlanta Public Schools et al
as 1:2024cv02045
Plaintiff:
Shirlene Jones
Defendant:
Atlanta Public Schools, Dr. Lisa Herring, Caroline Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
PORRECA v. HYBRIDGE LEARNING GROUP LLC
as 3:2024cv06011
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PORRECA
Defendant:
HYBRIDGE LEARNING GROUP LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
WILSON v. CARVANA, LLC
as 1:2024cv04042
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL M WILSON
Defendant:
Carvana, LLC, JOHN DOES 1-5 and JOHN DOES 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Eldred v. CommonBond Communities
as 0:2024cv00911
Plaintiff:
Madeline Eldred
Defendant:
CommonBond Communities
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Louks v. Belle Fountain Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
as 2:2024cv11233
Plaintiff:
Shana Louks
Defendant:
Belle Fountain Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
SHIN v. GLOBAL TEL*LINK CORPORATION A/K/A VIAPATH TECHNOLOGIES
as 5:2024cv00473
Defendant:
Global Tel*link Corporation and ViaPath Technologies (ViaPath)
Plaintiff:
DON SHIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
