Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gately v. Apex Control Systems, Inc. et al.
as 4:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Michael Gately
Defendant:
Apex Control Systems, Inc., Thomas Drakulich, Amy Farkas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
MAYROSE v. HOWELL TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 3:2022cv06204
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MAYROSE
Defendant:
HOWELL TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, HOWELL TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Howell v. WHAPPS, LLC
as 1:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
Allison Howell
Defendant:
WHAPPS, LLC doing business as Online Rewards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Tirado v. HCR Manorcare et al
as 1:2020cv02219
Defendant:
Shaquira Howell and HCR Manorcare doing business as Manorcare of York PA South, LLC
Plaintiff:
Angela R. Tirado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams-Young v. Duval County Public Schools et al
as 3:2020cv01203
Defendant:
Ronald Fagan, Michelle Begley, Rosa Howell and others
Plaintiff:
Phyllis N. Williams-Young
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Howell-Gonzalez v. The City of Mount Dora
as 5:2020cv00126
Defendant:
The City of Mount Dora
Plaintiff:
Jessica Howell-Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704
Howell v. Daewon America, Inc. (CONSENT)
as 2:2019cv00013
Plaintiff:
Devin Howell
Defendant:
Daewon America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Nedal Alqalqili v. Hospital of Barstow, Inc. et al
as 5:2018cv01739
Plaintiff:
Nedal Alqalqili
Defendant:
Carrie Howell, Quorum Health Corp, Hospital of Barstow, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Howell v. Portneuf Medical Center, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
Lance J. Howell
Defendant:
Portneuf Medical Center, LLC and LHP Pocatello, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
LANDRY v. HOWELL
as 5:2014cv00167
Plaintiff:
MISTY LANDRY
Defendant:
MIKE HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2617
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
