Cases 201 - 210 of 2,710
XR Communications LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
as 6:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
XR Communications LLC d/b/a Vivato Technologies and XR Communications LLC doing business as Vivato Technologies
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 100 Patent Infringement
Ask Sydney, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
as 6:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Ask Sydney, LLC
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
D3D Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation
as 23-1462
Appellant:
D3D TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Clark v. Microsoft Corporation
as 1:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
Cody Clark
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
AMMONS HARRIS et al v. GATES et al
as 1:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
JEAN T. AMMONS HARRIS and CLTEAM ADMINISTRATOR
Defendant:
BILL GATES, MICROSOFT and CONCEPT LUXURY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Martin v. Microsoft et al
as 3:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
Karim Abdul-Rahman Martin
Defendant:
North Carolina Microsoft Charlotte, Microsoft Innovation and Policy Center and Microsoft Corporation External Legal Affairs
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Bar-Lev v. City of San Diego, et al
as 3:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
Naomi Bar-Lev
Defendant:
Does 1-100, City of San Diego, Jonathan Dungan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra Fed. Question: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Daedalus Blue LLC v. Microsoft Corporation
as 23-1313
Appellant:
DAEDALUS BLUE LLC
Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
