Copyrights Cases filed in North Carolina matching "S"
Cases 51 - 60 of 828,154
Briones et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff: Irving Alexis Briones, Ariadna Rossell Urbina, Emma Leticia Garcia Morales and others
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00774
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00008
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Violation of Americans with Disabilities Act
PASCHALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00849
Plaintiff: ALICIA PASCHALL
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00652
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Marick et al v. Tsottles et al
as 8:2024cv01602
Plaintiff: Debra Marick, Anthony Michael Marick, Aden Joseph Marick and others
Defendant: Adam Tsottles, Envirosolutions Real Property Holdings, Inc. and Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Fender v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00228
Plaintiff: Heather A Fender
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Ragouzis v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: Edgar T. Ragouzis and Edgar Thomas Ragouzis
Defendant: Jr. Richardo O. Hamilton, John and Jane Doe(s) and ABC Legal Entities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gorbey v. Doe et al
as 6:2024cv00072
Plaintiff: Michael S. Gorbey, Tsunami Khan and Chief Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant: John or Jane Doe, Mr. Stoval, Tony Shult and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?