Cases 71 - 80 of 754
BELL v. HANA BUSINESS GROUP
as 1:2019cv01249
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
HANA BUSINESS GROUP
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
BELL v. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2019cv01505
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC. and MARRIOTT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BELL v. THE RAINMAKER GROUP - RENT JUNGLE LLC
as 1:2019cv01326
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
THE RAINMAKER GROUP RENT JUNGLE LLC and THE RAINMAKER GROUP - RENT JUNGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Oppenheimer v. Conn-Selmer Inc
as 3:2019cv00352
Plaintiff:
David Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Conn-Selmer Inc
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Iwasaki v. Apollo Design Technology, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00094
Defendant:
Apollo Design Technology, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rich Iwasaki
Not Yet Classified:
Kevin Fitzharris
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BELL v. CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
as 1:2019cv01285
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
TRADE DESIGN STUDIO LLC v. 1824 CARROLLTON LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01770
Defendant:
T.A.K.E. 3 INVESTMENTS LLC, 1824 CARROLLTON LLC and TENA ALLEN
Plaintiff:
TRADE DESIGN STUDIO LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. DMAN, INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01958
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., UNIVERSAL-MILLHOUSE MUSIC, a DIVISION OF MAGNA SOUND CORP., DANDELION MUSIC CO., a division of JAMIE MUSIC PUBLISHING CO. and others
Defendant:
DMAN, INCORPORATED d/b/a THE GROVE SPORTS BAR & EATERY, DEANN HENSLEY, JAMES D. PETTIGREW and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
BELL v. CISION US, INC.
as 1:2019cv01587
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
CISION US, INC. and BLAZE BRANDING GROUP INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
BELL v. JM BULLION, INC.
as 1:2019cv01636
Plaintiff:
RICHARD N. BELL
Defendant:
JM BULLION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
