Cases 111 - 120 of 828,452
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Title III Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Carrera-Chavez v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Pedro Carrera-Chavez
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Whortenberry et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2024cv02270
Plaintiff:
Regina Whortenberry and Cordell Whortenberry
Defendant:
LIBERTY MUTUAL PERSONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02273
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Booker v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Karlos Marquett Booker
Defendant:
Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
FOLK v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
OMAR S. FOLK
Defendant:
BOP DIRECTOR COLETTE PETERS, NER DIRECTOR AMY BONCHER, NER COUNSEL DARRIN HOWARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Port of Seattle v. Wang
as 2:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Port of Seattle
Defendant:
Donald P Wang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Tanner v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Kelly Tanner
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Ken Williams, C. Cass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
