Cases 1 - 10 of 38
CADWALLADER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv04507
Plaintiff:
NINA CADWALLADER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Moore v. O' Malley
as 1:2024cv00810
Plaintiff:
Nina Moore
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nina Kathleen Hiers v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv01008
Plaintiff:
Nina Kathleen Hiers
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Crystal Nina Kennedy v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv02415
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL NINA KENNEDY
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sann v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2022cv03293
Plaintiff:
NINA SANN
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Selmon v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 5:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Nina Jean Selmon
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mingle v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2021cv01110
Plaintiff:
Nina Mingle
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Moore v. Saul
as 1:2021cv01510
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Nina Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PARKER BROOKS v. SAUL
as 2:2021cv01312
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
NINA C PARKER BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nina M. v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00339
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Nina Frances McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
