Cases 11 - 20 of 796
WIRTZ et al v. ERICSSON INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
SAUNDRA WIRTZ, DAVID WIRTZ, FRANCES WIRTZ and others
Defendant:
ERICSSON INC., ERICSSON AB, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
Poisik v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Ari B. Poisik
Defendant:
Ian J. Thompson, Caleb Hubbard, Sean Mleczynski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
UNITED STATES ex rel. THOMPSON CONTRACTING GROUP, INC., v. COAST TO COAST DOCK AND SEAWALL, LLC
as 9:2024mc80201
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES ex rel. THOMPSON CONTRACTING GROUP, INC.,
Defendant:
COAST TO COAST DOCK AND SEAWALL, LLC
Hakimyar et al v. Habib Bank Limited
as 1:2024cv00993
Plaintiff:
Karim Hakimyar, Zara Karim, S.K. and others
Defendant:
Habib Bank Limited
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Silva v. O'Connell et al
as 4:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Christopher Z Silva
Defendant:
Kevin O'Connell, Zachary Thompson and Tim Fielder
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Porter Jr et al v. Town of Candia et al
as 4:2024cv40016
Plaintiff:
Richard W Porter Jr and Phyllis M Porter
Defendant:
Town of Candia and Michael Thompson
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Clyde Thompson, Crystal Ashley, Cayden Thompson and others
Defendant:
James Holley and Anthony P&L, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Porter Jr v. Town of Candia et al
as 4:2024cv40014
Plaintiff:
Richard W Porter Jr
Defendant:
Town of Candia and Michael Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Thlopthlocco Tribal Town v. Wiley, et al
as 24-5011
Plaintiff:
THLOPTHLOCCO TRIBAL TOWN, a federally recognized Indian Tribe
Defendant:
ROGER WILEY, RICHARD C. LERBLANCE, AMOS MCNAC and others
Doe et al v. Thompson
as 0:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
James Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Lafe Hunter Thompson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
