Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Bond Pharmacy, Inc. v. Garland et al
as 3:2023cv03158
Plaintiff:
Bond Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a AIS Healthcare
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Department of Justice, Anne Milgram and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Evergreen Pharmacy, Inc. v. Garland et al
as 1:2022cv03912
Plaintiff:
Evergreen Pharmacy, Inc.
Defendant:
MERRICK B GARLAND, Ann Milgram, Drug Enforcement Adlministration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
WEDGEWOOD VILLAGE PHARMACY, LLC v. U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2022cv02649
Plaintiff:
WEDGEWOOD VILLAGE PHARMACY, LLC
Defendant:
U.S. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, XAVIER BECERRA and DR. ROBERT M. CALIFF
Amicus Curiae:
ALLIANCE FOR PHARMACY COMPOUNDING
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. State of Texas
as 21-1445
Interested Party:
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, WASC SENIOR COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY COMMISSION, ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITIES and others
Defendant:
NATHANIEL R. MENDELL, US Attorney and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner:
FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER and SPEECH FIRST, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VICTIM RIGHTS LAW CENTER, JILL DOE, ANNE DOE and others
Not Yet Classified:
NEW YORK STATE COALITION AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT
National Association of Chain Drug Stores et al v. Becerra et al
as 2:2021cv00576
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Elizabeth Richter
Plaintiff:
Washington State Pharmacy Association, National Association of Chain Drug Stores and National Community Pharmacists Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Heartland Pharmacy, Inc. v. Rosen et al
as 2:2021cv14037
Defendant:
Jeffrey Rosen, Dir. Timothy J Shea and Drug Enforcement Administration
Plaintiff:
Heartland Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PS) Ciurar v. State of California et al
as 2:2020cv02089
Defendant:
California State Board of Pharmacy, State of California and Department of Consumer Affairs
Plaintiff:
Magdalina C. Ciurar
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Found. for Indiv. Rgts in Edu., et al
as 20-1748
Interested Party:
LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, WASC SENIOR COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY COMMISSION, ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AND LAND-GRANT UNIVERSITIES and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
VICTIM RIGHTS LAW CENTER, JILL DOE, ANNE DOE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BETSY DEVOS, in her official capacity as Secretary of Education, KENNETH L. MARCUS, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Civil Right, US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
Victim Rights Law Center et al v. DeVos et al
as 1:2020cv11104
Defendant:
Elizabeth D. DeVos, U.S. Department of Education, Kenneth L. Marcus and others
Plaintiff:
Legal Voice, Victim Rights Law Center, Equal Rights Advocates and others
Amicus Curiae:
National LGBTQ Task Force, Vera House, Inc., California Women's Law Center and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Independent Women's Law Center, Speech First, Inc., Foundation for Individual Rights in Education and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of New York v. United States Department of Education et al
as 1:2020cv04260
Defendant:
United States Department of Education and Elisabeth DeVos
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW YORK and The Board of Education for the City School District of the City of New York
Amicus Curiae:
Association of Public and Land-grant Universities, AASA, Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
