Cases 11 - 20 of 211
Johnson v. Watkin et al
as 1:2023at00479
Plaintiff:
Daymon Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Watkin, Richard McCrow, Thomas J. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Watkin et al
as 1:2023cv00848
Plaintiff:
Daymon Johnson
Defendant:
Steve Watkin, Richard McCrow, Thomas J. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Reeves et al
as 3:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Jackson City Branch of the NAACP and others
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Sean Tindell, Bo Luckey and others
Petitioner:
JXN Undivided Coalition, Mississippi Votes, PEOPLES ADVOCACY INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRYANT v. STEIN et al
as 1:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
AMY BRYANT, M.D.
Defendant:
JOSHUA H. STEIN, JEFF NIEMAN, KODY H. KINSLEY and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Timothy K. Moore and Philip E. Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Reynolds v. Utah Highway Patrol et al
as 2:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Amanda Reynolds
Defendant:
Utah Highway Patrol, Lane Hooser, Sandy City Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Le v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2023cv00004
Petitioner:
Duc Van Le
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Immigration and Custom Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Access Independent Health Services, Inc., et al v. Birch Burdick, et al
as 22-3595
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MKB Management Corp., doing business as Red River Women's Clinic, Kathryn L. Eggleston, M.D. and Access Independent Health Services, Inc., doing business as Red River Women's Clinic
Defendant:
Birch Burdick, in his official capacity as State Attorney for Cass County, Larry Johnson, M.D. in his official capacity as a member of the North Dakota Board of Medical Examiners, Robert Tanous, D.O. in his official capacity as a member of the North Dakota Board of Medical Examiners and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Drew Howard Wrigley, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of North Dakota, et al.
Severino v. Spagnola et al
as 3:2022cv01529
Plaintiff:
Mr. Dillon Severino and Dillon Severino
Defendant:
Fernando Spagnola, Ned Lamont, James Rovella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2972
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile
Amicus Curiae:
The City of New York, New York County District Attorney, Greater New York Hospital Association and others
Petitioner:
Bishops of the Episcopal Church in New York and New England et al, Jaclyn Schildkraut and 30 Members of New York State Legislature
Antonyuk v. Hochul
as 22-2908
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Ivan Antonyuk, Corey Johnson, Alfred Terrille and others
Defendant:
William Fitzpatrick, in his Official Capacity as the Onondaga County District Attorney, Eugene Conway, in his Official Capacity as the Sheriff of Onondaga County, P. David Soares, in his Official Capacity as the District Attorney of Albany County and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph Cecile, Steven A. Nigrelli, in his Official Capacity as Acting Superintendent of the New York State Police and Matthew J. Doran, in his Official Capacity as the Licensing official of Onondaga County
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
