Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cruz v. UIA, et al
as 23-2011
Plaintiff: REYNALDO CRUZ
Defendant: UNION INDEPENDIENTE DE EMPLEADOS DE LA AUTORIDAD DE ACUEDUCTOS Y ALCANTARILLADOS, (UIA), PUERTO RICO AQUEDUCT & SEWER AUTHORITY, PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS
Intervenor: OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES OF THE PUBLIC BUILDINGS AUTHORITY UNION and STATE INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEES UNION
Hendrix et al v. Howe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00185
Plaintiff: Jared Hendrix, Retire Congress North Dakota, Liberty Initiative Fund and others
Defendant: Michael Howe and Drew Wrigley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Kirk Medak v. State of Alaska, et al
as 23-35118
Plaintiff / Appellant: KIRK MEDAK
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF ALASKA, MICHELLE HIGUCHI, Judge and LISA MURKOWSKI, Senator, U.S. Congress
NetChoice v. Paxton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-51178
Plaintiff / Appellee: NetChoice, L.L.C., a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association, a 501(c) (6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant / Appellant: Ken Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
Amicus Curiae: Texas Public Policy Foundation, Babylon Bee LLC, Giganews, Incorporated and others
Not Classified By Court: Not the Bee LLC and Leonid Goldstein
Agarwal et al v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01873
Plaintiff: Anil Agarwal and Madhu Agarwal
Defendant: United States of America, US Congress, All Federal Courts Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Central Rabbinical Congress of v. New York City Department of He We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-107
Plaintiff - Appellant: Central Rabbinical Congress of the USA & Canada, Agudath Israel of America, International Bris Association and others
Defendant - Appellee: New York City Department of Health & Mental Hygiene, New York City Board of Health and Thomas Farley, Doctor, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Health & Mental Hygiene
Central Rabbinical Congress of the USA & Canada et al v. New York City Department of Health & Mental Hygiene et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv07590
Plaintiff: Central Rabbinical Congress of the USA & Canada , Agudath Israel of America , International Bris Association and others
Defendant: New York City Department of Health & Mental Hygiene , New York City Board of Health and Thomas Farley
Amicu: Infectious Diseases Society of America , Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society , American Academy of Pediatrics and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowen et al v. Cermele et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00549
Plaintiff: Barbara Bowen , Professional Staff Congress/CUNY , Frank Kirkland and others
Defendant: The State of New York, David A. Paterson, New York State Department of Audit and Control and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Commonwealth of Virginia, Ex Rel. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II v. Sebelius Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00188
Plaintiff: Commonwealth of Virginia, Ex Rel. Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, II
Defendant: Kathleen Sebelius
Amicu: Ray Elbert Parker, American Center for Law and Justice , Todd Akin and others
Movant: Steven J. Willis , Eve Ellingwood, American Civil Rights Union and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TAYLOR v. NEW JERSEY STATE et al
as 3:2009cv00553
Plaintiff: AUDREY TAYLOR
Defendant: NEW JERSEY STATE, ZELMA FABER, NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?