Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al v. California Air Resources Board et al
as 2:2024cv00801
Plaintiff:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, California Chamber of Commerce, American Farm Bureau Federation and others
Defendant:
California Air Resources Board, Liane M. Randolph, Steven S. Cliff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Hudnall et al v. City of Pasco et al
as 4:2023cv05168
Plaintiff:
Sheila Hudnall and Jon Hudnall
Defendant:
City of Pasco, Pasco Police Department, Pasco Police Department Chief Ken Roske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AK Industrial Hemp Association, Inc. et al v. Alaska Department of Natural Resources et al
as 3:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
AK Industrial Hemp Association, Inc., Primo Farms North LLC doing business as Primo, GD Sales LLC doing business as Hempire-Co. and others
Defendant:
Alaska Department of Natural Resources, John C. Boyle, III, Alaska Division of Agriculture and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
United States of America v. State of Idaho, et al.
as 1:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
State of Idaho, Idaho Departmentof Water Resources, Gary Spackman and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Idaho House of Representatives, Idaho Senate, Chuck Winder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Samuels et al v. McHenry City Post Office
as 3:2021cv50463
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER E SAMUELS, Michael S Braun, Industrial Resources Corporation and others
Defendant:
Post Office Mchenry City, Tom and Holly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
NetChoice v. Paxton
as 21-51178
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NetChoice, L.L.C., a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association, a 501(c) (6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant / Appellant:
Ken Paxton, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Texas
Amicus Curiae:
Texas Public Policy Foundation, Babylon Bee LLC, Giganews, Incorporated and others
Not Classified By Court:
Not the Bee LLC and Leonid Goldstein
NetChoice LLC et al v. Paxton
as 1:2021cv00840
Plaintiff:
NetChoice LLC a 501(c)(6) District of Columbia organization doing business as NetChoice and Computer & Communications Industry Association a 501(c)(6) non-stock Virginia Corporation doing business as CCIA
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Progress, The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, The American Civil Liberties Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frederick Allen v. Roy Cooper, III
as 21-2040
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FREDERICK L. ALLEN and NAUTILUS PRODUCTIONS, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
ROY A. COOPER, III, Governor of North Carolina, KEVIN CHERRY, Deputy Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources, individually and in his official capacity, KARIN COCHRAN, Chief Deputy Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources, individually and in her official capacity and others
Defendant:
FRIENDS OF QUEEN ANNE'S REVENGE, A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION
NETCHOICE LLC et al v. MOODY et al
as 4:2021cv00220
Defendant:
KYMBERLEE CURRY SMITH, PATRICK GILLESPIE, JONI ALEXIS POITIER and others
Plaintiff:
COMPUTER & COMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION doing business as CCIA, NETCHOICE, LLC doing business as NETCHOICE and NETCHOICE LLC doing business as NETCHOICE
Amicus Curiae:
TECHFREEDOM, CHAMBER OF PROGRESS, CONNECTED COMMERCE COUNCIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United Resource Systems Inc v. State of South Carolina, The
as 3:2021cv00364
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, The
Plaintiff:
United Resource Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
