Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Redeaux et al v. Wise et al
as 3:2024cv01979
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Redeaux, Andrea Smith and Pamela Jones
Defendant:
Noel Wise, Rebekah Evenson, Sarah Standard-Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
Wise v. State of Texas et al
as 2:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Michael R Wise
Defendant:
State of Texas, Matthew C Martindale, Angela N Fowlkes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Greene v. Huff et al
as 2:2015cv01881
Plaintiff:
Mark Greene
Defendant:
Sherril Huff and Julie Wise
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CTIA - The Wireless Association v. Echols et al
as 1:2013cv00399
Plaintiff:
CTIA - The Wireless Association
Defendant:
Tim G. Echols, Charles M. Eaton, Jr., Herman Douglas Everett and others
Pilarowski etal., v Wise etal.,
as 4:2010cv11170
Plaintiff:
Lisa Pilarowski , Zachary Pilarowski , Rachel Pilarowski and others
Defendant:
Susan Wise, Daniel Wise, James Wise and others
Kalish et al v. Milliken et al
as 1:2009cv01333
Plaintiff:
Julia Kalish, Suzanne Leitner-Wise, Suzanne Leitner-Wise Inc. and others
Defendant:
Christine T. Milliken, Susan A. Magill, Gilbert T. Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Donelon v. LA Div Admin Law
as 07-30482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES J DONELON, Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Louisiana
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, Through its Director, Ann Wise
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE COMMISSIONERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
