Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Ethel Tatum v. ADT Security Services, Inc., et al
as 12-12269
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ETHEL TATUM
Defendant - Appellee:
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC., RODNEY KENNEDY, CASEY COLVIN and others
Tatum v. ADT Security Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ethel Tatum
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc. , Rodney Kennedy , Casey Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC. v. NAPCO SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2011cv07057
Plaintiff:
ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
NAPCO SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nirvana International, Inc. v. ADT Security Services, Inc.
as 1:2011cv08738
Plaintiff:
Nirvana International, Inc.
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Godwin v. ADT Security Services, Inc.,
as 2:2011cv02899
Plaintiff:
Mae L. Godwin
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowyer v. ADT Security Services, Inc. et al
as 5:2011cv00140
Plaintiff:
David E. Bowyer
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc. and Howard Mallory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cabrera v. ADT Security Services, Inc. DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.
as 4:2011cv03483
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Cabrera
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Friedman v. Brink's Home Security, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv01909
Defendant:
ADT Security Services, Inc. , Brinks Home Security, Inc. and Broadview Security, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hillary Stone Friedman and Ian Friedman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Nikhil Jhaveri et al v. ADT Security Services Inc et al
as 2:2011cv04426
Defendant:
ADT Security Services Inc and Does
Plaintiff:
Ela Jhaveri and Nikhil Jhaveri
ELITE DIAMOND CENTER. et al v. ADT SECURITY SERVICES, INC.et al
as 2:2011cv00344
Plaintiff:
ELITE DIAMOND CENTER and GEORGE FAHMY
Defendant:
TYCO FIRE AND SECURITY OPERATING COMPANY, JOHN AND JANE DOE, ABC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
