Cases 21 - 30 of 62
Coe v. 3M Company
as 1:2020cv00562
Plaintiff:
Shawn Coe
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
3M COMPANY v. TECNICAM SRL INC et al
as 2:2020cv03814
Plaintiff:
3M COMPANY
Defendant:
TECNICAM SRL INC, CAMPAK INC and TECNICAM INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIDGWAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv05317
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH RIDGWAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLAESER v. THULIN et al
as 2:2019cv19434
Defendant:
AMY E. HOOD, MICHAEL L. ESKEW, DAVID B. DILLON and others
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Glaeser
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
GPT Properties Trust v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2019cv02463
Defendant:
Solar Security Films, Inc., 3M Company and D.L. Schmitz Waterproofing & Restoration Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
GPT Properties Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
3M Company v. Baumbach et al
as 1:2018cv00295
Defendant:
Walter P. Baumbach
Plaintiff:
3M and 3M Company
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Continental Diamond Tool Corp and Nick Viggiano
3Rd Party Defendant:
Tim Keene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chafflose Corporation et al v. Sasaya America, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv04819
Plaintiff:
Chafflose Corporation, Koji Sasaya and Sasaya America, Inc.
Defendant:
A and H Management Service Inc, 3M Company and A and H Management Service Inc a Ohio Corporation formerly doing business as Nylonge Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACS Industries, Inc. v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2017cv00135
Plaintiff:
ACS Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
3M Company and 3M Innovative Properties Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
3M Company et al v. B&D Dental Corporation et al
as 0:2017cv00651
Plaintiff:
3M Company , 3M Innovative Properties Company and 3M Deutschland GmbH
Defendant:
B&D Dental Corporation and B&D Dental Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
