Contract Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Patton v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00564
Plaintiff: Robert Patton
Defendant: Twin City Fire Insurance Co. , Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc. , Geico General Insurance Co. and others
Counter_claimant: Geico Indemnity Company , Geico Casualty Company and Geico General Insurance Co.
Counter_defendant: Robert Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
Baiden & Associates Inc v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co et al
as 2:2011cv00267
Plaintiff: Baiden & Associates Inc
Defendant: Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co, Clarendon National Insurance Co, Twin City Fire Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Baiden & Associates Inc v. Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv00267
Plaintiff: Baiden & Associates Inc
Defendant: Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co , Clarendon National Insurance Co , Twin City Fire Insurance Co and others
Cross_claimant: Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co
Cross_defendant: Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Co , Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Clarendon National Insurance Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
B E P C O L P v. Santa Fe Minerals Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00132
Plaintiff: B E P C O L P
Defendant: Santa Fe Minerals Inc , 15375 Memorial Corp , Entities Holding Inc and others
Cross_defendant: Certain Unidentified Underwriters at Lloyds London , United States Fire Insurance Co , First State Insurance Co and others
Third_party_defendant: Twin City Fire Insurance Co , Navigators Insurance Co , St Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co and others
Cross_claimant: Santa Fe Minerals Inc , 15375 Memorial Corp , Entities Holding Inc and others
Third_party_plaintiff: Entities Holding Inc , Santa Fe Minerals Inc , Transocean Worldwide Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Type: Contract Insurance
Harvard Drug Group, L.L.C., The v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv10066
Plaintiff: Harvard Drug Group, L.L.C., The
Defendant: Twin City Fire Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Type: Contract Insurance
Agri Systems, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company et al
as 1:2010cv00091
Plaintiff: Agri Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Hartford Fire Insurance Company , Hartford Specialty Company , Specialty Risk Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Citigroup, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins Co., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-20445
Plaintiff - Appellant: CITIGROUP INC, as succesor in interest to Associates First Capital Corporation
Defendant - Appellee: ACE BERMUDA INSURANCE LIMITED, FEDERAL INSURANCE CO., TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE CO and others
Type: Contract Insurance
LONGWOOD INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, LLC et al v. TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE CO. et al
as 1:2009cv04873
Plaintiff: LONGWOOD INDUSTRIES HOLDINGS, LLC and LONGWOOD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant: TWIN CITY FIRE INSURANCE CO. and THE HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract None
Romo v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co. et al
as 3:2009cv00317
Plaintiff: Eva Romo
Defendant: Twin City Fire Insurance Co. and Heather Foley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Plaintiff
Carlson v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2009cv00608
Plaintiff: Mark A. Carlson and Mark A. Carlson
Defendant: Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Twin City Fire Insurance Co., Twin City Fire Insurance Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?