Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 271
Tate v. Concentra Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01813
Plaintiff: Stephen Tate and Steven Tate
Defendant: Concentra Health Services, Inc., Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Perry Johnson & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tate v. Concentra Health Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00293
Plaintiff: Stephen Tate and Steven Tate
Defendant: Concentra Health Services, Inc., Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Perry Johnson & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Curry v. Concentra Health Services, Incorporated et al
as 2:2024cv10404
Plaintiff: Elliot Curry
Defendant: Concentra Health Services, Inc. a Nevada Corporation, Perry Johnson & Associates, Inc. and Concentra Health Services, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Goodhope Healthcare and Home Health Services, Inc. v. Aetna, Inc.
as 3:2024cv50064
Plaintiff: Goodhope Healthcare and Home Health Services, Inc.
Defendant: Aetna, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Malibu Behavioral Health Services, Inc. v. CareFirst of Maryland, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00383
Plaintiff: Malibu Behavioral Health Services, Inc. doing business as South California Road to Recovery
Defendant: CareFirst of Maryland, Inc., Group Hospitalization and Medical Services, Inc. doing business as CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield and CareFirst BlueChoice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Northeast Montana Health Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00009
Plaintiff: The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant: Northeast Montana Health Services, Inc., Barton & Associates, Inc. and Tony Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
University of Southern California et al v. Health Plan of Nevada Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv10520
Plaintiff: University of Southern California on behalf of its Keck Medical Center of USC dba Keck Hospital of USC and dba USC Norris Cancer Hospital, and on behalf of its USC Verdugo Hills Hospital and University of Southern California on behalf of its Keck Medical Center of USC doing business as Keck Hospital of USC doing business as USC Norris Cancer Hospital on behalf of its USC Verduo Hills Hospital
Defendant: Health Plan of Nevada, Inc., Sierra Health and Life Insurance Company, Inc., Sierra Health Care Options, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
DOE v. REID HOSPITAL & HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC. d/b/a REID HEALTH
as 1:2023cv02215
Plaintiff: Jane Doe
Defendant: Reid Hospital & Health Services, Inc. d/b/a Reid Health and REID HOSPITAL & HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC. d/b/a REID HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Goodsell et al v. Teachers Health Trust et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01510
Plaintiff: diana goodsell, Sheri DeBartolo, Michelle Reilly and others
Defendant: Teachers Health Trust, Clark County School District, Medsource Management Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
de Moor et al v. Anthem Blue Cross et al
as 4:2023cv00968
Defendant: Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc., Hawaii Medical Services Corporation doing business as Hawaii Medical Services Association also known as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Hawaii, Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc. formerly known as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Colorado doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nevada and others
Plaintiff: MD Carrie de Moor and Code 3 Emergency Physicians, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?