Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Johnson v. BBVA USA
as 1:2021cv00634
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Johnson
Defendant:
BBVA USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Lexington Insurance Company
as 9:2020cv82076
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Johnson
Defendant:
Lexington Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Whitten v. Clarke et al
as 1:2017cv02585
Plaintiff:
Jerrell Whitten
Defendant:
Ronald F. Clarke, Michael Buckman, Joseph W. Farrelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gimourginas v. Johnson et al
as 8:2017cv00426
Plaintiff:
Linda Gimourginas
Defendant:
Karen R. Johnson and Mark A. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mark R. Johnson v. Black Knight Infoserve, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv00858
Defendant:
Black Knight Infoserve, LLC and DOES
Plaintiff:
Mark R Johnson
Pershing, L.L.C. v. Wanda Bevis, et al
as 14-30525
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PERSHING, L.L.C.
Defendant - Appellant:
WANDA BEVIS, THOMAS BOWDEN, also known as Eddie Bowden, ROBERT E. FELDMAN and others
Pershing LLC v. Bevis et al
as 3:2013cv00671
Defendant:
Wanda Bevis, Thomas E Bowden, Robert E Feldman and others
Plaintiff:
Pershing LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities & Exchange Commiss
Johnson v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2012cv01123
Plaintiff:
Mark A Johnson
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY v. ABRAMS et al
as 2:2011cv01567
Defendant:
THEODORE MONGELL, DAVID SCOTT, WERNER ENTERPRISES and others
Plaintiff:
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
3Rd Party Defendant:
HALLMARK INSURANCE CO.
Special Master:
THOMAS T. FRAMPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Johnson v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank National Association
as 1:2009cv00727
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Johnson
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
