Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Springboards to Education Inc v. Hamilton County Read 20
as 1:2017cv00199
Plaintiff:
Springboards to Education Inc
Defendant:
Hamilton County Read 20
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Fastbridge Learning, LLC et al v. ServeMinnesota et al
as 0:2017cv01456
Plaintiff:
Fastbridge Learning, LLC and Theodore J. Christ and Colleagues LLC
Defendant:
ServeMinnesota and Reading & Math, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Reading & Math, Inc. and ServeMinnesota
Counter_defendant:
Fastbridge Learning, LLC and Theodore J. Christ and Colleagues LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Reading Venture One, L.L.C. v. Cooper
as 2:2016cv13369
Plaintiff:
Reading Venture One, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Kim Cooper
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Reading Venture One, L.C.C. v. Cooper
as 2:2016cv13371
Plaintiff:
Reading Venture One, L.C.C.
Defendant:
Kim Cooper
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Springboards to Education Inc v. Hamilton County Read 20
as 3:2016cv02509
Plaintiff:
Springboards to Education Inc
Defendant:
Hamilton County Read 20
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Waters Industries, Inc. v. Ready Reading Glasses, Inc.
as 1:2016cv07939
Plaintiff:
Waters Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Ready Reading Glasses, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
HEALTH PARTNERS PLANS, INC. v. READING HEALTH PARTNERS, LLC
as 5:2016cv01340
Plaintiff:
HEALTH PARTNERS PLANS, INC.
Defendant:
READING HEALTH PARTNERS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Innovative Automation LLC v. Baker & Taylor, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv01335
Defendant:
Baker & Taylor, LLC and K-NFB Reading Technology Inc.
Plaintiff:
Innovative Automation, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PUBLIC CONSULTING GROUP, INC. v. AMERICAN READING COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2015cv10495
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC CONSULTING GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
AMERICAN READING COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Heigl v. Duane Reade, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02502
Plaintiff:
Katherine Heigl
Defendant:
Duane Reade, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
