Cases 31 - 40 of 541
Jackson v. Saul
as 2:2020cv02236
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Betty Louise Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Anderson v. Saul
as 1:2020cv01326
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Betty Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
De Los Santos v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00169
Plaintiff:
Betty I. De Los Santos
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Kunze v. Saul
as 4:2020cv04139
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Betty J Kunze
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ritcheson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2020cv02169
Plaintiff:
Betty Ritcheson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Eddleman v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv02717
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Betty Jean Eddleman
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Bettis v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2020cv02429
Defendant:
ANDREW M SAUL and Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Debra Bettis
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing and SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Haynes v. Saul
as 2:2020cv00262
Plaintiff:
Betty Jean Haynes
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hamilton v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00104
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah D. Ellis and Betty J. Hamilton
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Andrew Saul
Not Classified By Court:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Nichols v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2020cv00470
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Betty Nichols
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
