Cases 31 - 40 of 311
Ellis v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv01443
Plaintiff:
Alicia Renee Ellis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rucker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Rodney Ellis Rucker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Provitt v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ellis Provitt, Jr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ellis v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00632
Plaintiff:
Eric R Ellis and Eric Richard Ellis
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of Social Security Decision (DIWC)
Ellis v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00664
Plaintiff:
Robert Ellis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Powers v. Ellis
as 5:2022cv03556
Plaintiff:
John Powers
Defendant:
Debby Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Keuter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05444
Plaintiff:
Ellie L Keuter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ellis v. Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv03464
Plaintiff:
Charles Taze Ellis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Raheem Ellis v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 22-11647
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAHEEM ELLIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Ellis v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
Shawntelle Ellis
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
