Cases 1 - 10 of 6,121
Blink v. Social Security
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Blink
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Maylette E. Brown v. O Malley
as 5:2024cv01201
Plaintiff:
Maylette E. Brown
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Friedman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Amy E. Friedman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Lara v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05439
Plaintiff:
Marcelo E Lara
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Garske v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02649
Plaintiff:
Walter E. Garske, III
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stanley v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Stanley
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Marshall v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv11431
Plaintiff:
Robert E Marshall and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Arnold v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04334
Plaintiff:
Darrell E. Arnold
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
NERO v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01156
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E NERO
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Schreiner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04221
Plaintiff:
Christine E. Schreiner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
