Cases 1 - 10 of 17
STARNES v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
RACQEL STARNES
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Starnes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ryan Starnes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Starnes v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv05978
Plaintiff:
Angie D. Starnes
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
STARNES v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2021cv06084
Plaintiff:
STEPHANLEE STARNES
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Starnes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2020cv03372
Plaintiff:
Mary Starnes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Starnes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00097
Plaintiff:
Wendy D. Starnes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Starn v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv00350
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Starn
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Starnes v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00322
Plaintiff:
Marcia R. Starnes
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Starnes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2015cv00427
Plaintiff:
Shanna C Starnes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425
Starnes v. Colvin
as 4:2015cv00110
Plaintiff:
Lesha Lanett Starnes
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
