Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Grimmett v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Amy M. Grimmett
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Koth, Amy v. Kijakazi, Kilolo
as 3:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
Amy M. Koth
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Westgate v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv11611
Plaintiff:
Amy M Westgate
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Hicks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv01530
Plaintiff:
Amy M Hicks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Lieber v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv02048
Plaintiff:
Amy M Lieber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Dare v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv01188
Plaintiff:
Amy M. Dare
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lindeman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv01393
Plaintiff:
Amy Maria Lindeman and Amy M Lindeman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kostelny v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv06074
Plaintiff:
Amy M. Kostelny
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
ESSELBORN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv02277
Plaintiff:
AMY M. ESSELBORN
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Matthews v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2021cv00193
Plaintiff:
Amy M. Matthews
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
