Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Bowling v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Zachary Bowling
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bowling v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Melynda Bowling
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Bowling v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv50216
Plaintiff:
Daniel Michael Bowling
Defendant:
Comm'r of SSA Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jennifer Bowles v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 22-2119
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JENNIFER BOWLES
Defendant / Appellee:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Manetirony Clervrain v. Kilolo Kijakazi, et al
as 22-1078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
DAN RUSYNIAK, MICHAEL A. GARGANO, PAUL BOWLING and others
Bowling v. SSA
as 6:2022cv00037
Plaintiff:
Jamie Kay Bowling
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bowles v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2022cv00013
Plaintiff:
James Bowles
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
CLERVRAIN et al v. KIJAKAZI et al
as 1:2021cv03036
Plaintiff:
MANETIRONY CLERVRAIN, ROODE A. CLERVRAIN, SHAMEEL CLERVRAIN and others
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, DAN RUSYNIAK, MICHAEL GARGANO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bowles v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2021cv01720
Plaintiff:
Mark S. Bowles and Diana Bowles
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BOWLES v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00243
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
