Cases 1 - 10 of 745
Frank v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
John Frank
Defendant:
General Counsel Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Attorney General of the United States and Ronald C. Gathe, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Frank v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Courtney Frank
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Agatha Marie Frank v. Martin O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Agatha Marie Frank
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Genene Frank v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
Genene Frank
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Woodworth v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Frank Woodworth
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Frank Enriquez v. Martin O Malley
as 2:2024cv02184
Petitioner:
Frank Enriquez and Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Franks v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Dustin H Franks
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Frank Nellom v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 23-3215
Plaintiff:
FRANK NELLOM
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Frank Montoya v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv10465
Plaintiff:
Frank Montoya
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FRANK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2023cv23020
Plaintiff:
PAIGE M FRANK
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
