Cases 1 - 10 of 16
McDonald v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv04195
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Marie McDonald
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Banks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv06376
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Marie Banks
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WOODS v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE MARIE WOODS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
VARNER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00791
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE MARIE VARNER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dieckow v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2020cv01365
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Mary Dieckow
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ROYSTER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2020cv00051
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE MARIE ROYSTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dieckow v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv00796
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Mary Dieckow
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hansen v. Saul
as 0:2019cv01587
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Marie Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
ROYSTER v. BERRYHILL
as 5:2017cv00302
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE MARIE ROYSTER
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KEEL v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE MARIE KEEL
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
