Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Eterno v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Linda Lee Eterno
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7405 IRS: Action for recovery of refunds erroneously made
Rando v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Linda Lee Rando
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BENNETT v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv02140
Plaintiff:
LINDA LEE BENNETT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hooker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Linda Lee Hooker
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Langston v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2018cv03077
Plaintiff:
Linda Lee Langston
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
v. Schlyter et al
as 1:2016at00929
Defendant:
Linda Lee Schlyter and Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Schlyter v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv01710
Plaintiff:
Linda Lee Schlyter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Lane v. Social Security Administration (TV1)
as 3:2016cv00164
Plaintiff:
Linda Lee Lane
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McKinniss v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2014cv00293
Plaintiff:
Linda Lee McKinniss
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Linda Durr-Irving v. Carolyn Colvin
as 13-3275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LINDA DURR-IRVING, also known as LINDA LEE IRVING
Defendant - Appellee:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
