Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Stacy v. SSA
as 6:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lynn Stacy
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Seamans v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lynn Seamans
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gill v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 3:2023cv00054
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lynn Gill
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mitchum v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lynn Mitchum
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Porter v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2022cv00259
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lynn Porter
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rebecca Pruitt v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 22-5152
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBECCA LYNN PRUITT
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Dembowski v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lynn Dembowski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BURTON v. SAUL
as 2:2021cv00141
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
REBECCA LYNN BURTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Stacy v. SSA
as 6:2020cv00223
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lynn Stacy
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
James v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00795
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Lynn James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
