Cases 1 - 10 of 922
Hamilton v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Roger Ambrose Hamilton
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rogers v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Denise Rogers
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv00441
Plaintiff:
Roger John Donald Jones
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ward v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Ward
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024at00079
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Rogers v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Christina L. Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Long v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Roger Edward Long
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Warriax v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv02094
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff:
Roger Warriax
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1381 Supplemental Security Income Benefits (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
