Cases 1 - 10 of 486
Henderson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ruth Henderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cunningham et al v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Arnette Cunningham and Madelyn Ruth Cunningham
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Walters v. O'Malley
as 24-40225
Plaintiff:
Alice Ruth Walters
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Anapol v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Ruth Anapol
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Ruth E. Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Engebretson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Ruth Engebretson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Scott v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Ruth Keralynn Scott
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Moore v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Ruth Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Ruth Rodriguez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Terrapin v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Ruth E Terrapin
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
