Cases 1 - 10 of 372
COOK v. COLVIN
as 2:2024cv06909
Plaintiff:
SEAN I. COOK, SR.
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Garman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv01561
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Garman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Voelker v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv02128
Plaintiff:
Sean William Voelker
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Haas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01236
Plaintiff:
Sean Haas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv03545
Plaintiff:
Sean Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pointzes-Johnson v. Colvin
as 2:2024cv13256
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Jeremi Sean Pointzes-Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
BURKE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv10922
Plaintiff:
SEAN BURKE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Owens v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Sean D Owens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Douglass v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03149
Plaintiff:
Sean Eric Douglass
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sander v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01911
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Sean S. Sander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
