Cases 1 - 10 of 1,506
Heck v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00838
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Heck
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rabor v. SSI SSD et al
as 4:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Tammy Rabor
Defendant:
SSI SSD, FNU Heard, FNU Smith and others
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Nokes v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 3:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Tammy Kim Nokes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Goodwin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Tammy Goodwin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Burk v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Burk
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 7422 Appeal from Administrative Decision
Survilla v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Tammie Survilla
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tammy Spader v. Martin O'Malley
as 24-1683
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Spader
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Coffelt v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Tammy Dee Coffelt
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Munro v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00375
Plaintiff:
Tammy Lea Munro
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Love v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Tammy Love
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
