Cases 1 - 10 of 3,180
Chadwick v. Comissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Chadwick, II
Defendant:
Comissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Thomas L v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Thomas Lavery
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Estes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brian Estes
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Charissa Dawn Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wolfe v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2024cv03023
Plaintiff:
Thomas P. Wolfe
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00138
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Darryl Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thomas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Bryan Wayne Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Darling v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Thomas P Darling
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Ulitto v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03039
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ulitto
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thomas v Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Coleia Thomas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
