Other Statutes Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 149
Virda Bullard, et al v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe R, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-8011
Not Party - Petitioner: JOHN G. ALEXANDER, ELNORA BELL, PAULLETTE BLAYLOCK and others
Not Party - Respondent: BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY, KOPPERS INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and others
Gulf Metals Industries, Inc. et al v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 4:2008cv00672
Defendant: Amoco Oil Company, Beazer East Inc, Tenneco Resins Inc and others
Plaintiff: Gulf Metals Industries, Inc. and Cooper Industries, L.L.C.
Cross Defendant: Royal Dutch Shell, Lyondell Refining I LLC, Lyondell Refining Co and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Angeles Chemical Company Inc et al v. Omega Chemical PRP Group LLC et al
as 5:2007cv01471
Defendant: George Industries, Safety-Kleen Systems Inc, Quality Carriers Inc and others
Plaintiff: John Locke, Angeles Chemical Company Inc and Greve Financial Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America et al v. ACF Industries, LLC et al
as 4:2007cv01215
Plaintiff: United States of America and Missouri, State of
Defendant: ACF Industries, LLC, Campbell Soup Company, Cargill, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
United States Department of Justice vs. Rajendra Jamnadas We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00491
3Rd Party Defendant: Legacy Vulcan Corp., Dow Chemical Company, E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Intervenor Plaintiff: Ecology and Environment, Inc.
Defendant: Rajendra Jamnadas, Stephen C. Lyon, Suzanne S. Lyon and others
Cross Defendant: Cooper Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
as 1:2007cv00336
Plaintiff: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant: DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
IMMERMAN v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv00027
Plaintiff: RICHARD IMMERMAN
Defendant: BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER AG, BAYER MATERIALSCIENCE, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Xilinx, Inc., et al v. CIR We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 06-74246
Petitioner - Appellee: XILINX, INC., AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Respondent - Appellant: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Amicus Curiae: CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ALTERA CORPORATION, FORMER U.S. TREASURY AND INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OFFICIALS and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending: APPLE, INC., ALTERA CORPORATION, CYPRESS SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION and others
Emhart Industries, Inc. v. New England Container Company, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2006cv00218
Plaintiff: Emhart Industries, Inc
Counter Claimant: New England Container Company, Inc, Black & Decker Inc., Organic Dyestuffs Corp. and others
Defendant: Providence Washington Insurance Company, Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company, United States Department of the Navy and others
Counter Defendant: United States Department of the Air Force
Cross Claimant: The United States of America and Black & Decker, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Induplate Inc, Eli Lilly and Company, Univar USA, Inc. and others
4Th Party Plaintiff: BASF Corp.
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Black & Decker Inc
4Th Party Defendant: ConocoPhillips Company and Rohm and Haas Company
Cross Defendant: BNS, LLC
Not Classified By Court: Original Bradford Soap Works, Inc. n/k/a Bradford Soap International, Inc, Eastern Color & Chemical Co, Teknor-Apex and others
Petitioner: Rhodes Technologies, Inc., The Dow Chemical Company and Win Noren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
PACTIV CORP V DOW CHEMICAL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 05-1260
Defendant-Appellee: DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Plaintiff-Appellant: PACTIV CORPORATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?