Cases 151 - 160 of 263
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv02009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
McKay v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC et al
as 4:2010cv00507
Plaintiff:
Barbara D. McKay
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC, Thomas Marano, Michael Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dang et al v. HSBC Bank USA et al
as 5:2010cv01283
Plaintiff:
Tuan Hai Dang, Doris Buu, Kim Dang and others
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (MERS), Executive Trustee Service, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Debt Collection Act
Cettolin et al v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC, et al
as 3:2010cv08036
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC , Executive Trustee Services, LLC and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Fausto U Cettolin, Jr. and Donna L Cettolin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Christopher Rodriguez v. GMAC et al
as 2:2010cv01235
Defendant:
Does, GMAC and GMAC Mortgage, LLC
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rodriguez
Bowen v. GMAC Mortgage LLC et al
as 5:2010cv00036
Plaintiff:
Robert Bowen
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage LLC and Mortgage Electronic Registration System Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Bernardina Zuniga v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00518
Defendant:
Does, ETS Services, LLC, GMAC Mortgage, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bernardina Zuniga
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
