Cases 11 - 20 of 32
George Badeen, et al v. Renovo Services, LLC, et al
as 20-2008
Defendant / Appellant:
REMARKETING SOLUTIONS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, for itself and as successors in interest, RENOVO SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and PAR, INC., an Indiana corporation, dba PAR North America
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GEORGE BADEEN, an individual and on behalf of a proposed class and MIDWEST RECOVERY AND ADJUSTMENT, INC., a Michigan for profit corp., individually and on behalf of a proposed class
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05128
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00369
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nichole L. Richards v. Par, Inc., et al
as 19-1184
Defendant / Appellee:
LAWRENCE TOWING, LLC. and PAR, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLE L. RICHARDS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv02735
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv02681
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SOGN v. ALASKA USA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION et al
as 1:2018mc00043
Defendant:
ALASKA USA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and CAR SERVICE L.L.C.
Interested Party:
PAR, INC.
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. SOGN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
