Cases 11 - 20 of 10,983
Stein v. Cangemi et al
as 1:2024cv02363
Plaintiff:
Herbert Stein
Defendant:
Thomas R. Cangemi, Alessandro P. Dinello, James J. Carpenter and others
Raby v. Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10761
Plaintiff:
Gerald Raby
Defendant:
Evolv Technologies Holdings, Inc. f/k/a NewHold Investment Corp., Peter George, Mario Ramos and others
Petitioner:
Douglas Buchan, Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System and Robert Falk
WPI Collateral Management, LLC et al v. Ramaswamy et al
as 1:2024cv02148
Plaintiff:
WPI Collateral Management, LLC, Banzai Advisory Group, LLC, Banzai Capital Partners, LLC and others
Defendant:
Vivek Ramaswamy, Strive Enterprises, Inc., Strive Asset Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Peter Terrelonge v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1472
Petitioner:
PETER HORACE TERRELONGE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Kenneth ThorntonIn re: Kenneth Thornton
as 24-1941
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH E. THORNTON
Respondent:
BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVES OFFICE, in her official capacity, PETER CARBONE, in his individual and official capacity, MARLENE EVERETTE, in her individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
LISA JONES, in her individual capacity and SHARON D. BUCKLEY, in her individual capacity
Papagni Fruit and Juice, LP v. James Corrado Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Papagni Fruit and Juice, LP
Defendant:
James Corrado Inc., Peter Corrado, Gerald Corrado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
