Cases 21 - 30 of 41
HENCH v. CMH HOMES, INC. et al
as 4:2016cv00486
Plaintiff:
WENDY HENCH
Defendant:
CMH Homes Inc. , CMH Manufacturing, Inc. , VANDERBILT MORTGAGE AND FINANCE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
HENCH v. CLAYTON HOMES, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv01227
Plaintiff:
WENDY HENCH
Defendant:
CLAYTON HOMES, INC. , CMH HOMES, INC. , CMH MANUFACTURING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant And 3rd-Party Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Third Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-1966
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant And 3rd-Party Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Third Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CMH Homes, Inc. v. Wood
as 5:2014mc00165
Plaintiff:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark S. Wood
CMH Homes, Inc. v. Wood
as 5:2014cv26946
Plaintiff:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark S. Wood
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
CMH Homes, Inc. v. Browning, et al
as 2:2014cv12762
Petitioner:
CMH Homes, Inc.
Respondent:
Tina Browning and Dewey Foster
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Thomas Goodner, et al v. Clayton Homes, et al
as 12-8021
Respondent:
Thomas Goodner, Individually and On Behalf of a Class of All Other Similarly Situated Individuals and Linda Goodner, Individually and On Behalf of a Class of All Other Similarly Situated Individuals
Petitioner:
Clayton Homes, Inc. and CMH Homes, Inc.
CMH HOMES, INC. v. TAYLOR et al
as 4:2012cv00103
Plaintiff:
CMH HOMES, INC.
Defendant:
KEVIN R. TAYLOR and MADONNA L. TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
