Cases 21 - 30 of 2,153
Graham v. Equifax Information Services LLC
as 4:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Denise Graham
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sanchez v. County of Graham, et al.
as 24-1675
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH SANCHEZ, an adult individual
Defendant:
COUNTY OF GRAHAM, a government entity, PJ ALLRED, Graham County Sheriff, a government officer/jural entity, ARTHUR PEREZ, JR., husband and others
US v. Tremayne Graham
as 24-6243
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TREMAYNE K. GRAHAM, a/k/a Kiki
CUNNINGHAM v. WALLACE & GRAHAM, P.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
CRAIG CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
Bill Graham, Joel R Rhine, P Mark Doby and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Graham v. Governor of Texas Greg Abbott
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kyle Graham
Defendant:
Governor of Texas Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Schultz v. County of San Joaquin, et al.
as 24-692
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL SCHULTZ
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, AYERS, Deputy Sheriff, UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICE, LP and others
United States of America v. Graham
as 24-292
Defendant:
THOMAS DEGREE, JORDAN DAVIS, JOHNNY WILLIAMS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LAIRON GRAHAM, Shah, Uncle Shah and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Bloom et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 3:2023mc80319
Plaintiff:
Everett Bloom, David Lindholm and Jack Graham
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
