Cases 21 - 30 of 29,086
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
Sivak v. Winmill, et al.
as 24-3379
Plaintiff:
LACEY SIVAK
Defendant:
B. LYNN WINMILL, DISTRICT JUDGE, AMANDA K. BRAILSFORD, DISTRICT JUDGE and DAVID C. NYE, DISTRICT JUDGE
Gomez v. Cullen
as 24-1455
Defendant:
GEORGE ROBINSON, J.B. FOSTER, HSA, K. SORRELL and others
Plaintiff:
JORGE GOMEZ
US v. Jose Rivera
as 24-6518
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JOSE RUIZ RIVERA, a/k/a Miguelito, a/k/a Miguel
US v. Reyes-Rosario
as 24-1504
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
CARLOS J. REYES-ROSARIO, a/k/a Carlitos Mea, a/k/a El Mea, a/k/a Apestoso
Sugar Bake Shop, Inc. v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv01992
Plaintiff:
Sugar Bake Shop, Inc.
Defendant:
ASR Group International, Inc., American Sugar Refining, Inc., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Brandon et al v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Chester Brandon, III
Defendant:
Commissioner William K. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
US v. Rolando Galeana-Trevino
as 24-4294
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ROLANDO GALEANA-TREVINO, a/k/a Rolando Galeana Trevino, a/k/a Rodolfo Romeromacias, a/k/a Rodolfo Romero, a/k/a Rodolfo Macias Romero, a/k/a Rodolfo Macias-Geleana, a/k/a Augustine Garcia, a/k/a Augustine Macias Garcia, a/k/a Marco Antonio Peres
Xencor, Inc.In re: Xencor, Inc.
as 24-1870
Appellant:
In re: XENCOR, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
US v. Anthony Andrews
as 24-6513
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHONY ANDREWS, a/k/a Wheat
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
