Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Henry Cuellar, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 20-1139
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ARLEAN J. DAWES and HENRY MURILLO CUELLAR
Defendant / Appellant:
DIRECTOR NEW YORK FIELD OFFICE IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, DIRECTOR HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv02456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
William Dawes v. The People
as 19-56418
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM DAWES
Respondent / Appellee:
THE PEOPLE
William Dawes v. The People, et al
as 19-56340
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM DAWES
Respondent / Appellee:
THE PEOPLE and XAVIER BECERRA
Charles Campbell v. Hollie Bennett
as 19-2149
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. CATHERINE A. STONE, MR. CHARLTON B. HALL, MR. DEAN GRIGG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES R. CAMPBELL
Daw v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 3:2019cv08212
Defendant:
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Plaintiff:
Eugene Daw
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Low Life Transport LLC v. Dawes Contract Carriage LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00754
Defendant:
Dawes Contract Carriage LLC, William J Dawes and William Joseph Dawes
Plaintiff:
Low Life Transport LLC
Arkels et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11308
Plaintiff:
Bradley Luckhart, Bobby Bolden, Mason Morris and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
