Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 659
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1399
Petitioner: State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: Gulf Coast Lignite Coalition, Calpine Corporation, Lignite Energy Council and others
Amicus Curiae: Technological Innovation Experts, Nicholas Ashford, M. Granger Morgan, Edward S. Rubin, and Margaret Taylor, Carbon Capture and Storage Scientists, Roger Aines, Sally Benson, S. Julio Friedmann, Jon Gibbins, Raghubir Gupta, Howard Herzog, Susan Hovorka, Meagan Mauter, Ah-Hyung (Alissa) Park, Gary Rochelle and Jennifer Wilcox and Saskatchew Power Corporation
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Safeguard Metals LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00691
Defendant: Jeffrey Santulan, Safeguard Metals LLC and Jeffrey Hill
Plaintiff: Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Alabama Securities Commission, Arizona Corporation Commission and others
Petitioner: Utah Division of Securities
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Amazon.com Inc Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01495
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission, State of New York, State of Connecticut and others
Defendant: Amazon.com Inc
Intervenor: Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff: Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant: Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
People of the State of Michigan v. Lokinski We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv12326
Plaintiff: People of the State of Michigan
Defendant: Markel Ken Lokinski
Dana Nessel v. Enbridge Energy, LP, et al
as 23-1671
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANA NESSEL, Attorney General of the State of Michigan, on behalf of the people of the State of Michigan
Defendant / Appellee: ENBRIDGE ENERGY, LP, ENBRIDGE ENERGY COMPANY, INC. and ENBRIDGE ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
Prince v. State of Michigan
as 2:2023cv12226
Plaintiff: Gerald Amos Prince, Jr.
Defendant: State of Michigan
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee: Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff: STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant: GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court: STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant: NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner: AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent: BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Westmoreland Mining Holdings v. EPA
as 20-1160
Petitioner: Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor: Sierra Club, Conservation Law Foundation, Montana Environmental Information Center and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?