Cases 31 - 40 of 585
State of New York, et al v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
as 21-7078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of New York, District of Columbia, State of California and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Facebook, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
United States of America, American Antitrust Institute, Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Westmoreland Mining Holdings v. EPA
as 20-1160
Petitioner:
Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
Sierra Club, Conservation Law Foundation, Montana Environmental Information Center and others
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
RISING EAGLE v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
RISING EAGLE and JOHNATHAN M. STUDIVENT
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA STATE TROOPERS, NORTH CAROLINA GOVERNOR ROY COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
State of North Carolina, Onslow County Court et al v. Davis
as 4:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, Onslow County Court, K. Shotwell, Judges and others
Defendant:
William Hercules Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
State of North Carolina, Edgecombe County v. Everette, Jr.
as 4:2023cv00063
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, Edgecombe County
Defendant:
Thomas Everette, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
United States of America et al v. JetBlue Airways Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv10511
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, District of Columbia and others
Defendant:
JetBlue Airways Corporation and Spirit Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al
as 5:2022cv04325
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.,, Within Unlimited, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg and others
Interested Party:
Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, State of Alaska, State of California and others
Not Classified By Court:
ByteDance Inc., Valve Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Forte Nexus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
