Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Carl Hylton v. Attorney General United State
as 15-3543
Petitioner:
CARL OSMOND HYLTON
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01551
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mehmood v. Delaney et al
as 2:2015cv01818
Defendant:
11 Board of Governors, USPS, 12 Board Members, CCA, Administrative Office of the United States Courts and others
Plaintiff:
Yasir Mehmood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ou-Young v. Obama et al
as 3:2015mc80185
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P Ou-Young
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, II, Richard G. Kopf, D. Lowell Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ou-Young v. Obama et al
as 3:2015mc80180
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
Barack Hussein Obama, II, Richard G. Kopf, D. Lowell Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. American Express Company
as 15-1672
Plaintiff:
State of Hawaii
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America, State of Maryland, State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Mastercard International Incorporated and Visa Inc.
Defendant - Appellant:
American Express Company and American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Joseph Gregory Sidak, Esq., Robert D Willig, David J Teece and others
Movant:
Home Depot USA, Inc., 7-Eleven, Inc., Academy, Ltd., DBA Academy Sports + Outdoors and others
USA v. Milton Hylton
as 15-1671
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MILTON HYLTON, a/k/a David Halter
Del Rio v. Obama et al
as 4:2014mc02992
Petitioner:
Victor Del Rio and N Del Rio
Respondent:
Barack Obama, Eric Holder, James Cole and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
